It first helps to know who the hell Dale Peck is. He's a book reviewer with a schtick: He eviscerates writers. Actually, that sort of understates matters. He is to literary criticism what Genghis Khan was to travel journalism, razing whole university English departments and putting entire villages of University of Iowa creative-writing graduates to the sword. Why so vicious? I suspect in part it's because he grew up in Kansas. Consider his review of the works of Rick Moody, who wrote the novel that was the basis for the movie The Ice Storm:
Rick Moody is the worst writer of his generation...
Together these books amount not so much to an oeuvre as to a career, one whose success, though fascinating, is inexplicable to me. In fact, I have to confess that I consider myself unequal to the task of analyzing Moody's writing. Its faults strike me as uniform and self-evident and none of them are complex enough for a sustained analysis. My gut feeling is that if you honestly do not believe that this is bad writing, then you are a part of the problem. When I finished The Black Veil I scrawled "Lies! Lies! All lies!" on the cover and considered my job done. Like all of Moody's books, it is pretentious, muddled, derivative, bathetic. His much-touted compassion strikes me as false (in his fiction he makes his characters suffer in order to solicit your pity, and this seems no less true of the self that he describes in The Black Veil); his highly praised prose -- "rhythmic" and "evocative" are the tags that you see most often --comes only at the expense of precision, which is to say, of truth.
Ouchie! (Read the whole thing.).
Naturally, this make him an appealing judge for The Morning News' annual Tournament of Books, which is something like the NCAA basketball tournament but without the cheerleaders and overactive pituitary cases. It works like this: Readers select the books to participate in the Tournament. Then the books are seeded into bracketsand judged in a single-elimination tournament by reviewers.
A quirk in this year's Tournament gave two books -- "The Accidental" by Ali Smith and "Saturday" by Ian McEwan -- a second attempt to crack the contest. Dale Peck was tapped to judge. His review is predictably harsh to both:
... speaking more generally -- hell, you're all just waiting for the pull quote anyway -- books like these make me want to join al Qaeda. It's not so much the books themselves that make me wish our way of life would come to an end sooner rather than later, but, rather, the fact that seemingly intelligent and educated people find reasons to praise them.
Then he refused to pick a winner!
The lovable lugs over at The Morning News responded in two ways. First, they flipped a coin and gave the contest to Ali Smith. Then they laid into Dale Peck big time. Says one staffer:
My first attempt at this commentary was probably twice as long as Dale Peck's review and included phrases like "intellectual poseur," "retarded knob," "narrow as a childless panda's urethra," and "all the nuance and sophistication of a Rage Against the Machine baby-doll tee."
Says the second:
In order to outdo Dale Peck in the B.R. Meyers "everything created after a certain date is crap" sweepstakes, I'd like to declare that everything published since Og scratched out "Fire Make Meat Easier to Chew and Also Kills Worms That Live on Meat" on his cave wall using a stick and the blood of his best mate is worthless puke that gives comfort to al Qaeda.
Like Mr. Peck, I am supposedly a teacher at an accredited institution of higher learning, and one thing I have learned during my career is when someone hasn't done their homework and, in this case, it seems clear that Mr. Peck read neither book. His "I can't be bothered to choose" attitude is the critical equivalent of someone pointing and saying, "Hey, look over there," before running away.
Honestly, what primarily impresses me here is the number of kickass emo band names I can pick out of his commentary. "Bourgeois Illusions," "Troubled Conscience," "Assuaging the Guilt," "Social Compact," "Species Suicide," "Mea Culpas."
I'm eagerly watching Dale Peck's blog for a response. Can the big boy eat what he dishes out?
jebus4me said:
Illiterate? I can read, I just choose not to.nokhbah said:
kindly give me the list of failed products in pakistan and why they failed and what kind of stretegies they used??????? please do reply me on my e.mail adress its my university project. thnxhellx said:
The first year or so, I felt horribly read so I started reading more of the sort of books that might make it into the ToB. Even so, I still have never read more than four books at the start of a tournament. The best part is, even though I've read a lot of good books over the course of the year, thMr. Guapo said:
The Andrew W.K. Conspiracy.Mr. Guapo said:
As usual, I haven't read any of them. I feel illiterate. Jebus, is that what it feels like to be you? But I've rediscovered reading. Dr. No bought me the final book in James Ellroy's Underworld USA trilogy, "Blood's a Rover," which kicks all kinds of ass. Then two Paul Theroux books, the Dexter FilMembers' Blogs
Sparkling Squirrel Year
• Plantnerd
Bag O' Glass
• TSI!
Pedimobility
• Thinman
Exercise Before Knitting
• Elinor
Welcome to Oz
• Mrs. Soul
Powered by MT Blogroll
* denotes a recently updated blog
Recent Posts
Archives
[What is this?]