Conservative Rush Limbaugh got the ax first. Now it’s the liberal Gregg Easterbrook who’s getting the heave-ho.
« Press Release of the Day | Main | Gregg Easterbrook! Gregg Easterbrook! »
ESPN: fair and balanced
Posted by Hellx on Tuesday, October 21 2003 at 1:06 PMOfficial Business
Search
Recent Comments
hellx said:
Before I wrote that, I thought about whether Easterbrook could be classified as liberal. Essentially, the decision that I reached is that if Lieberman can be classified as a liberal, then so can Easterbrook. While he advocates some proscriptive positions based on his Christianity, on almost all li
[link]
doubleohsoul said:
I'm not sure I'd call Easterbrook liberal. Perhaps that was the joke. However, I can't help but wonder whether the speed at which the gentleman was put to the curb for comments on an unrelated personal blog may not be somehow related to his jumping of the shark, as discussed earlier on Norlos.Members' Blogs
Sparkling Squirrel Year
• Plantnerd
Rodents, sparkling wine, sharing more books and encouraging friends to eat vegetables (seriously).
Bag O' Glass
• TSI!
Kid! Be careful! Broken glass!
Pedimobility
• Thinman
Car-Free in Mid-America
Exercise Before Knitting *
• Elinor
A graduate and new mother knits, but don't you dare think that gets in the way of other things.
Welcome to Oz
• Mrs. Soul
Martin in Melbourne
Powered by MT Blogroll
* denotes a recently updated blog
Recent Posts
Archives
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
Comments
I'm not sure I'd call Easterbrook liberal. Perhaps that was the joke. However, I can't help but wonder whether the speed at which the gentleman was put to the curb for comments on an unrelated personal blog may not be somehow related to his jumping of the shark, as discussed earlier on Norlos.
Posted by: doubleohsoul | October 21, 2003 1:30 PM
Before I wrote that, I thought about whether Easterbrook could be classified as liberal. Essentially, the decision that I reached is that if Lieberman can be classified as a liberal, then so can Easterbrook. While he advocates some proscriptive positions based on his Christianity, on almost all liberal-conservative litmus test issues he comes down on the liberal side.
Posted by: hellx | October 21, 2003 2:37 PM